Utopia Temple
Main Forum Page Register an Account for Free! Calendar Frequently Asked Questions about this Board View New Posts Advanced Search Login
  Utopia Temple Forums > General Discussions > Respectable General Discussions > Religious Discussions

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
  Post New Thread
Author Thread
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Posts: 5/33
(04-Mar-2011 at 23:09)


Re: Faith based arguments.

Originally Posted by DHoffryn: View Post
No it doesn't. You can't just define someone as credible. They are many factors and this essentially undermines your whole point. Credibility comes from the amount of information we know about the witneses and the situation. The further we go back the less information we have about all these factors


As long as you have the expertise it's really not that hard. Any second hand movie studio can do it. Stage magicians, con man and pretty much anybody who put's a little effort and can organise a few people


Your comments are indeed ridiculous


I might as well copy paste it
Your comments are indeed ridiculous


That lowers the credibility actually


Your comments are indeed ridiculous


Only in your mind
It's a hypothetical situation. I can define them as credible for the sake of the point being made, without explaining what makes them credible. Perhaps you may want to look up the concept of "hypothetical".

My hypothetical situation did not include a staged murder, just as it DID include credible witnesses. You seem to want to redefine my scenario to nit pick on factors that weren't included in the first place.

Does it lower the credibility when one esteemed scientist has a theory based on huge amounts of solid data, and another esteemed colleague has another theory which is based on the same data? What if these theories created a rift in the scientific community, and half of the greatest minds on the planet found one more plausible and the other half thought the other theory was? Are all these people less credible because they believe one theory over another very plausible theory? Does this rift make their original solid data, which was used by both, void?

The same concept can be applied to the Old Testament being the solid data that all 3 of these major religions use.

BTW I love your thorough comments to most of my post, I say the majority of the world's population believes in the God of Abraham. You simply dismiss it as ridiculous. Great comeback!

Call my comments ridiculous if you like but with out explaining why just shows that your ability to have well thought out conversation is found wanting. I respect your beliefs no matter how opposed or ridiculous I think they are. But, I would be mature enough to explain why I feel that way.

Failure to do so lowers your credibility, and makes you look like a guy without answers..... who resorts to quick little insults in lieu of a reason why.
#11  
View Public Profile Find more posts by adam332 Add adam332 to your Buddy List Reply with Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Forum Jump:

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Atheism History & Arguments (youtube links) Peppie Religious Discussions 62 24-Dec-2006 15:38
Why ask the monothesists about God ? Grashnak Religious Discussions 30 24-Sep-2004 20:00
Grabs based on NW? Wavelength Utopia Suggestions 10 18-Jun-2002 07:15
religious system solistus Utopia Suggestions 8 18-Mar-2002 09:44
Next Age Digger The Lunatic Asylum 30 14-Apr-2001 07:56


All times are GMT+1. The time now is 01:03.

Powered by vBulletin (modified)
Copyright ©2000-2006, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.